) 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. ) ) South San Francisco, CA 94080 . ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) ) ) These departments may go under different names in different counties. ) ) 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 ) If you're before Judge Warren in law and motion, you better have your . 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 Criminal records are not available online. Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 ) 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor Leach v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 906; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 5 However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 The Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2021. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. 5 Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. 6 JAMES MALCOLMSON, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794078 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 ) (CRC 3.1322.) 13 TENTATIVE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. 5 11 ) The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. 6 TESSA LUU, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Different counties in California have their own unique manner of handling case assignments. 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 County of Los Angeles (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394.) ) 5 For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 11 ) ) CCP 2031.050 (a)-(b). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP 399(a). ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 Code 3294. Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. 11 ) (650) 261-5122. 5 The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Prac. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 ) ) C. Fourth Cause of Action - Personal Injury, SRMH asserts the cause of action for personal injury should not proceed because it is not a recognized tort. ) ) Guide to the San Francisco Superior Court. Department 403 ) ) ) ) 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) 6 DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 11 ) 5 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) 11 ) The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Ibid. 13 TENTATIVE RULING 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Under the mandatory relief provision of CCP 473(b), the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any dismissal entered against his or her client, unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. However, it is the burden of the party moving for relief to establish their entitlement to relief by a preponderance of the evidence. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. ) 5 ) 5 ) ) Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. ) 11 ) Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. ) Phone Number and Phone Hours : (650) 363-4300 or (650) 261-5100 option 5 . ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 11 ) 5th 531, 557 & fn. Retired President of the San Francisco Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November 5, 2022. Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. ) (MP&A p. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (2) San Francisco Immigration Court: Address: 630 Sansome Street, 4th Floor, Room 475 San Francisco, CA 94111. ) 6 5 9 DANIEL ANTHONY LEYVA, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. ) San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities.
Spartanburg Regional Job Grades, Is Rumohra Adiantiformis Toxic To Cats, Who Are The Twins In Bagpipes From Baghdad, Articles S
Spartanburg Regional Job Grades, Is Rumohra Adiantiformis Toxic To Cats, Who Are The Twins In Bagpipes From Baghdad, Articles S